Nobody needs to use software of this kind in the normal organic synthesis lab. You are asking the wrong man. IMHO the math in quetion is very simple, you don’t need a software, arithmetics on a piece of paper will do – but the obtained cost figure will be misleading because in chemistry process things go wrong all the time and you have no idea what you are up against until you try the experiments. I suppose you are in custom synthesis, somebody just gave you a procedure you don’t know if the procedure is reproducible or if it is a poorly-documented crap that will need lots of optimisations. You cannot predict if your product will gum up or melt on the filter and decompose – or if it will crystallize in the end in shiny needles. And you would like to quote a price and win the contract. There are too many unpredictable factors and no fancy software will help you.
Offer your customer to do the chemistry on reasonably small scale first. For the cost of the pilot run add cost of reagents, employees benefits and salaries, equipment and waste treatment, multiply it by factor of four and quote it as a price for pilot run. Expect that you can lose money on this run. After the pilot run you will get more appreciation of the problems and expenses, you can talk to your chemists and arrive at a more realistic figure that you can quote to your customer as the actual scale-up price. Leave sufficient margin for unforeseen problems. It makes no sense to try to get a contract by underbidding everybody else – only later finding out you set yourself up for failure, lost money and aggravated your customers.
Thank you for the group portrait. The one detail that’s not right is the shape of the sink – the lab sinks here tend to be large, sqarish, waist-high and black-colored. Otherwise it is a correct depiction. Please can I expand your drawing and post it at the sink? – Right next to the sign “Aim away from the toothbrush”
Re: Cost calculations
Try ChemProject from: http://www.chembytes.com. I think there is a time-limited trial period, although you probably can’t print the results.
I am one of those “process guys”, and have “done it myself” for years since pc’s came out (yes I am that old to remember a time before !). You can do a lot with a spreadsheet, but what you don’t get is error checking, and too often your colleagues structure their calculations diffrently so no-one knows how to edit correctly if changing a mole ratio or something like that. The commercial package provides a common structure, and this one can add up the reaction volumes from step to step as well, if you want, keep track of waste volumes etc.
Thank you for your comment. I always had hard time spotting my own typos – I am dyslexic and english is my fourth language. WordPress spell-check does not work with this particular theme that I chose. (One can copy/paste into Word, to see the typos – a routine I have been using from time to time). Since I am not too worried about my credibility, I would suggest to all spelling bees that they go and knock themself off.
An inexpensive little program called Grammarian will give you much relief. It checks spelling and grammar and is very easy to use, and it will work on your blog posts very well. The developer is always willing to lend a hand. He will personally respond to questions and does not charge for new versions.
I came to your site after reading your post on foodwishes, and I’m enjoying my visit. A brother-in-law of mine is a chemist at the company that let you go. He works in NJ. He isn’t happy there and is on the look for something else. Life it too short to spend your workday in an unhappy environment. The money may be okay, even good, but the older you get the more you understand that happiness is not dependent on money. We get value from our time when the emphasis is on the people we spend it with. Far less happiness comes from having money related experiences and “things”. Good luck to you, and keep cooking with Chef John.
If you have a few moments, I have a question (after some exposition, of course).
Some months ago, you posted an answer to the New Scientist Last Word blog – some poor creature was heating wine and olive oil and spattered himself and asked for an explanation. It was called “Kitchen Calamity.”
I witnessed a similar (I believe) incident on a much larger scale when a co-worker was doused by a hundred or so gallons of water, which erupted out of a 4′ by 6′ deep sump pit, but was not scalded in any way. The rubber grip of the screwdriver he was holding deformed and was soft. The sump pit collects steam condensate which often reaches temperatures of 150-160 deg F before it is pumped out. We were getting ready to work on that pump when a large column of water gushed from the 2 ft. diameter access port cut into the metal cover of the sump pit, struck the ceiling 12 feet above and covered the basement floor with several inches of water. The water was hot, but not uncomfortably so and was certainly not boiling.
The only clues were the very distinct and overwhelming odor of chlorinated solvent, such as methylene chloride or the like, and the rubber grip. The vapors were strong enough such that all four of us in the basement developed headaches or dizziness until we got fresh air.
We sampled what water was left in the sump and found no organic solvents at all. Except for a thin film of oil, the water had no significant contamination. It is possible the heat and turbulence evaporated any volatile solvent in the pit.
Searching literature I found little to explain this until I hit on the Last Word entry. The film of oil, mystery solvent and hot water seem to me akin to the explanation you posted.
Finally, the question: is there a name for this phenomenon or do you know where I might find out more about it? My co-workers and I are curious types and the chemists here mostly shrug us off when we have asked.
Thanks for any assistance you might lend. Contact me if you have any questions or wish to know any more of the incident.
what you described makes sense – when you have a heated vessel with a lower-boiling liquid covered by a non-miscible upper layer, it is easy to overheat it because the upper layer acts like a lid, keeping the vapors in – but as the bottom layer gets few degrees over its boiling point suddenly the whole thing erupts with or without even the mildest provocation.
Dichloromethane is low-boiling (40C I think), it is not miscible with water and forms a bottom layer. It is a good bet that was it – and you did not get scalded because the water sitting on top was only maybe 50C warm.
Snehal, I have never made a 4-cyanopyridine. I suppose if you have 4-chloropyridine, heating it with CuCN in DMF or DMAc under Ar and then working up the react mix with EDTA disodium salt solution basified with ammonia, to remove Cu, should work.
There is a nice Pd-catalysed cyanantion reaction from Merck process group that uses 0.2 equiv K4Fe(CN)6 as a cyanide source, DMAc as a solvent and Pd(OAc)2 (2 mol%) as catalyst (without ligand), heating under Ar, I suggest that you give it a try with chloropyridine also.
Also 4-Cl pyridine should be reactive enough for you to give it a try with NaCN in DMSO.
We have a fumarate salt of a base, final API. We got assess the chloride percentage before we market the sample. When we did the AgNO3 test, we get a white ppt. My doubt is can fumarate form a silver carboxylate salt anad still give a white ppt. Is there any method to determine the chloride content for carboxylate salts. your reply in this regard is highly appreciated. take care
Unfortunately I cannot help you with this – I never did this kind of analysis myself. I wonder if there is any good selective electrode for chlorides. I suppose you can send your sample to a lab for a simple elemental analysis, to determine the total halogen content after mineralization. But again, the best would be to ask a process chemist. Best luck!
We in the chemical industry are distressed over the aceto tightness.
It’s disruptive to everyone.
We don’t want labs to have to switch solvents.
We’re working on new aceto sources. Write to me at firstname.lastname@example.org as I might be able to get you some.
Can you suggest me whether electrophilic reductions using borane complexes or alanes including DIBAL could be run in solvents other than THF OR DME or Toluene or DCM. My substrate is not soluble in any of the solvents as it contains a quaternary amonium salt. Your suggestion in this regard is highly appreciated.
I am afraid this is a difficult problem with these reagents. Borane is compatible with pyridine as a solvent but pyridine greatly decreases the borane reactivity so the hydroborations need to be done at elevated temperature. DIBAL will not work with pyridine but maybe it will tolerate HMPA. The problem is that coordination of HMPA will alter DIBAL reactivity for sure. I think it is much better to modify your substrate instead.
In your case I would make your quaternary ammonium with some very greasy anion, like Ph4B(-) or PF6- to make it soluble in dichloromethane. I would simply mix your material (as a chloride or whatever you have) with NaBPh4 or KPF6 and see if a greasy-anion salt precipitates out from aqueous solution, if not I would just extract it into DCM and evaporate. Best luck!
PS: I should add that I have been making various tetraaryl/alkyl borate salts of quaternary ammoniums, about a decade ago, and they were greasy and quite soluble in DCM – I could even run a chromatography column on these compounds with unmodified silica and common solvents and they separated nicely.
I have a very short list of compounds I won’t work with – Ni(CO)4 is at the top and after explosions on the part of two grad school colleagues using tBuLi and the recent death of a technician at UCLA from a tBuLi fire, concentrated tBuLi made the list. I’m planing on using TMS-N3 in the kinetic resolution of an epoxide but haven’t used it before and it looks pretty nasty. I see that you have. I’d appreciate your general thoughts on the care and feeding of this volatile toxic. Do you have to separate the waste stream or is there a standard way of treating azide containing waste to ameliorate the explosion hazard? All the cautions I read in the lit just say to treat with appropriate care, without ever elaborating.
TMSN3 is quite easy to work with if you keep in mind that the acute tox is high (rapid headaches etc but it does not seem to have long-term aftereffects) so you don’t want to inhale it, pour it on your fingers (it penetrates latex so the disposable gloves should be changed quite fast) and when spilled outside hood the lab needs to be evacuated promptly and the spill should be let dry by itself. Contact with moisture or protic solvents is a problem because HN3 vapors get produced but for small scale experiments the explosion risk is pretty low. But chlorinated solvents and heavy metals need to be avoided. Separate waste is probably unnecessary unless you work with very large quantities but I would make sure it goes diluted into organic waste and does not get mixed with things like copper or silver salts.
Some people got sickened by TMSN3 but I did not hear of any fatalities; I would be far more cautious when working with TMS-CN, that can be a killer if mishandled. The unpleasant symptoms of azide poisoning can be effectively relieved by getting drunk
Thanks. It’s so widely used that it seems like it can’t be quite as bad as the MSDS makes it sound, but I think I will keep it away from the undergrads and only handle it myself. I was also figuring treating waste with Ph3P should eliminate any risk.
I am not sure if PPh3 reacts with hydrazoic acid that easily: OH to azide direct conversion can be done under Mitsunobu conditions. Keeping TMS azide away from freshman undergrads is probably a good idea. MSDS: sometimes the useful info is missing but from the dramatic hazard description one almost couldn’t tell sand from a warfare agent.
So you are resolving a 1,2-disubst epoxide, with a chiral salene catalyst? I have only done the kinetic hydrolytic resolution of terminal epoxides, it worked very nicely.
HKR is good for terminal, and I’ve used that many times as well to good effect, but it turn out the earlier TMSN3 (actually, catalytic HN3 produced in situ by hydrolysis of the TMSN3) is, by my reading of the lit, used for 2,2-disubstituted species much more. It’s what Jacobsen originally developed before he realized that the TMSN3 is a lot of atoms to throw away to get to enantiomerically pure epoxide. I tried HKR and just couldn’t get it cold enough to get good ee’s on the substrate I’m using.
Srini: thanks, I am a chemist working in academia – after being at few US companies in the past. I would love to give you my e-mail address but some time ago I posted here a story about working in the industry (“Such, Such Were The Joys”) and non-chemist-sounding people connecting from New York headquarters of a company mentioned in that story became eager to find out who I was and who was my employer – so I had to take down the most direct personal info including the e-mail address.
If you have a synthetic chemistry-related question, please post it in the comment section of the latest post – I will try to answer it, within a reason, though I am not going to do a literature search for you.
God, are people nosey or what?? Definitely you’d be cautious about putting your email and other personal info on the blog
I guess, then maybe I could *chat* up with you this way??
As of now, I don’t have any synthetic chem info to ask of you and NO!! definitely, I’d not ask you to a literature search for me.
Here are some of the questions and would like your opinions/advice on them. If you could point me to a website, that’d be fine as well. But I’d *really* like your opinion(s) about a) and b) considering your vast research experience.
a) What according to you, would be a *good* research experience before going to a grad school? The reason I ask this is: I want to work in a lab and get to know what the research experience entails before going into grad school. More so, in my case, since I come from the Biology background. I have taken Adv Org Chem courses in my master’s and liked it a lot. Reading about the bad experiences (say with organolithiums/ organometallics) in the lab kinda overwhelms me. Is that because I have NO experience in a Chem Lab? As a prospective grad student would I have to pay so much attention to this? Or is it something which kinda wears off when one starts getting into the grind?
b) Some of the (asst/ assoc) profs quote their interests as one or more of the following – Synth Org Chem, Natural products, Asymmetric Synth, New reactions’ methodology. Are these fields mutually exclusive? Or do all of them use the same skills set? If they use the same set of skills, why do people quote them separately? Mentioning Synth Org Chem would mean that one is doing Asymmetric Synth and New reactions’ methodology. Right??
c) Kind of a general question – what are the future prospects of Synth Org Chem? By prospects, Iam not asking how much money I can make, but which other areas can be influenced by Synth Org Chem? Chem Bio?? I also mean where the Synth org Chem skills be used in..
d) Do older people go to grad schools? Because of family circumstances, I think I’d have to aim at grad school only when iam 35+
e) About univs for Organic Synth- I checked out the Farm’s, the Tech’s and the one in Cambridge websites for (young) profs who work in Organic Synthesis. The number looks pretty low. I was also checking out groups which are small (in number) but in big schools. My logic was atleast the interaction between the prof and students will be more if the group size is small. Is that a valid assumption? Any other obvious univ which I’ve not considered/ missed?
Reason why Iam particularly checking out young (asst/assoc) profs is: by the time I go to grad school, most of the seasoned profs (who are already 65+) might be pretty old (70+) and near retirement and if they continue to remain as emeriti, they may not be interested in grad students and maybe interested in only post-docs…
Thanks for your time and sorry about the bucketload of questions
You have to be slightly more careful when working with nasty and flammable chemicals, the rule is that you don’t rush or scale up synthetic experiments on the first try. Mistakes and accidents are unavoidable early in the career but they tend to be less serious when done on small scale. Nasty chemical reagents are like strangers – once you get to know them better you can be more confident about how they will behave.
If you want to go into an organic synthesis program later on and look for a job in the meantime, the best kind of experience is in organic synthesis – that is running synthetic experiments in the lab; you can’t become a professional pilot without spending hundreds hours in the cockpit. Find a research technician job with a pharma company or custom synthesis lab. Or in a research group at academic institute/university – although industry typically pays more. Try to get your name onto some of their published stuff, journal articles and patents – it will look good on your resume. You will need at least some publications and very good personal references if you want to go to grad school in your late 30s. (It will be more difficult but a man ought to take care of his family first).
Synthetic chemistry is quite enjoyable profession if you like spending lots of time in the lab playing with things that you design. The problem nowadays is with having a stable job: pharma industry is by far the biggest employer of synthetic chemists and as you know the pharma industry situation in US these days is quite bleak. These things can change and industry will always need synthetic chemists, except that right now there are more PhD chemists looking for job than jobs available.
(Also if you are more physical-chemistry and instrument-oriented you could consider going into a NMR spectroscopy or a X-ray crystallography or mass-spectrometry groups – these are rather niche chemistry professions but good NMR or X-ray crystallographers are always in demand. But it is very different kind of work from organic synthesis.)
Total synthesis is a pretty academic pursuit and mostly serves to train students and postdocs in synthetic methodology, plus to showcase the new methodology on difficult problems. It is a wonderful thesis project to have but its rare to land a total-synthesis job after you finish the school (unless you are in a position to start your new academic group dedicated to total synthesis). Most people with a chemistry degree end up working in pharma-, biomed- and material-science related industries.
As to which academic group to apply to: You need the best possible name at best possible school, and in addition the prof needs to be a decent person who not only squeezes out maximum work out of his students but also helps them to get jobs afterwards. The relationship with your grad school advisor is the most important one for your career. I also suggest that you try someone younger, assistant prof on tenure track at a good university, maybe someone who is just starting his lab – he might be eager to get a student with a previous lab experience.
Any reason (other than financial/family pressures) as to why older students in grad school find it tough(er) than their younger counterparts?? Grad schools/ (asst/assoc) profs don’t look at old(er) students that kindly??
Thanks a lot for your opinion/advice. It certainly helps in bringing clarity.
I think the most obvious difference is that a young guy without a family, fresh and uncritically enthusiastic, is likely to spend more time in the lab and be fanatic about doing the research. (I am not saying it is the right way to live your life, often more than five years – and people burn out if they do nothing else but their project – its just that most professors are focused on advancing their own careers rather than making the grad school experience pleasant. If the student is an ambitious workaholic, the prof is only going to encourage it; its like a beekeeper living off the honey – so no matter how pleasant he seems to you, the foremost thing on his mind is what you can do for him to make him more famous. The main difference between good and bad advisors is in what they give you back in return, whether they help you with your career after you graduate.)
In your case, the questions that will most likely come up are – does he have an additional experience that can make him more productive and self-sufficient in the lab, and a publication record that proves it? Where is his wife and kids, and are they likely to be a distraction in his work on the research project?
Thanks Milkshake for your opinion. One last group of questions
Do applicants to reputed Grad schools normally have (many)publications? Particularly in Experimental Sciences? Would a glowing reco from the prof/person in whose lab the research experience was gained have any value? And Subject GRE scores+ GRE+ GPA would have a lesser value towards grad school application vis-a-vis research experience+ publication (if any) + patent (if any) ?
Each school and admission committee has its own preferences but all what you mentioned is important – especially the glowing recommendation letters and publications and test scores.
You will need to pass GRE and get good scores in chemistry and general math, logic part. The language (verbal) part of GRE needs to be just around average when you are a foreign applicant but math and logic and chemistry score percentiles should be in 90s. I would recommend that you practice it – get hold of the old GRE questions, the organization that makes these tests (ETS) used to sell the old question sets – and the authors and the question types are always the same every year. The questions are not too difficult (the general math part does not go past trigonometry!!) but the question wording is sometimes awkward. Most people lose on GRE scores because there is too little time and they get stuck on one question and run out of time before they can answer all remaining questions. The final score ranking is based on percentile and the most crowded range is right about the median, it thins up as you go up – that means you can get ahead of lot just by teasing out few extra points by being slightly faster and more calm than others; getting familiar with the test format and practicing these test question with a stop-watch, for about a week, definitely helps you with the speed and anxiety.
It will surely help you to have few publications/patents to your name (you don’t have to be the first author).
There is usually a letter or an assay that goes with your application, where you have to explain why you want to go to chemistry grad school. It helps to be specific and write in how you are excited about total synthesis/asymmetric methodology/transition metal catalyzed reactions, and you chose it because at your previous industry research job you worked on such and such project, etc.
It would also help you if you could get a scholarship – the chemistry grad schools in US typically provide their own funding for applicants that could not get outside scholarship (but they then make them to teach undergrad classes and score the exams for it), but even the richest schools are more excited about the applicant that brings in the outside scholarship money. So you should find out what is available to you and apply for scholarships in advance. (please don’t do a student loan, I think its a bad choice for a chemist.)
Milkshake can u suggest me a good method to make 15% NaOCl solution. When it was attempted with 40% NaOH solution and Cl2 gas at -5 degree, Cl2 was passed over 4 to 5 h i could at the maximum get 4 to 6 % NaOCl solution. Is there any thing more to get a 15% solution. Your expert comment is appreiated.
…but I am not an expert. I always used the commercial Clorox bleach which is about 4-5% NaOCl. Aldrich was selling a more concentrated solution of NaOCl but that solution does not store well so I cannot recommend it.
If you need a more concentrated source of hypochlorite you can try Ca(OCl)2, aka chlorinated lime. It is a solid and it is extremely cheap. I guess one can use it as a slurry with ice-cold diluted aqueous NaOH.
There seem to be lots of interdisciplinary and new areas – BioOrganic Chem, Chem Bio??
How different is Chem Bio from Biochemistry? And Bioorganic Chem from Organic Chem/ Medicinal Chem?
Are these new disciplines truly interdisciplinary in that exposure to techniques related to both Biology and (Organic) Chemistry? Do they focus on the same thing differently or on totally different things?
How are these interdisciplinary areas perceived? By industry and academia? Fad?? Or Not??
I do not recommend interdisciplinary programs. They may be interesting to you but it is a really bad career choice – you will not be employable when you graduate from one. You need to specialize within a subfield. If you have some outside experience in addition to your own specialty it can be viewed as advantage but you don’t want to be in two or three fields at the same time (and perceived as not having a solid background in either one of them). In all companies and institutes where I have been so far, the chemistry, the biology, the computation modelling and the spectroscopy was all handled by different people that were specialists in their own field. And rightly so – these jobs are quite different one from another. Chemists don’t express proteins and molecular modelers don’t run butyl lithium reactions.
Also what gets advertised as medicinal chemistry program in schools is typically being frown upon by the medchem people in the industry. The companies like to hire hardcore organic chemists who have a broad and up-to-date experience in synthetic methodology and a proven record of using it on complicated target molecules. (Graduating from a good school or a famous group is a plus.) You get a much better chance of getting impressive publications from a total synthesis project or an asymmetric methodology work rather than from a medchem project. And the medchem project often takes many years to publish because of the intellectual property problem, and when it finally gets published it often goes into low-rated journals like BMCL, and its series of simple compounds that all look very similar – a lousy project to present at a job interview.
I’m not sure but think Derek Lowe had addressed this interdisciplinary thing – Chem Bio and especially getting a doctorate in these kind of programs, in his blog…
Are these topics – Enzyme Mechanisms, Biosynthetic Pathways – considered non-interdiscplinary? I think what you are saying is that even if one gets to work with a prof. whose interests are in Bio-Organic Chem (say) then one’d either have to take either the Chemistry approach to it OR the Biology approach to it and NOT both. Right??
First you need to get into a good group; when you have paper with Stuart Schreiber in Nature it does not really matter that it is interdisciplinary. But I have seen too many people from half-baked bio-org and med-chem graduate programs, being seriously disadvantaged in comparison with their total-synthesis colleagues, so in general I cannot encourage anyone to go interdisciplinary.
To paraphrase the Dalai Lama, it’s a good thing to dig for water in more then one place, but if you never dig deeper then five feet, you’ll never get water. Which is to say, get a good solid grounding in something, and then work from there.
I was always under the impression that as a grad student, you would publish more papers in methodology versus total synthesis (where you might make one or two molecules in your PhD). Whereas methodology tends to have easier targets = more papers. Is that true?
I’ve also read that total synthesis is a dying art. I am very interested in it, but if I understand what you’re saying it seems that companies still do value that?!
Its true that there is a growing number of people who roll their eyes (instead of being awed) when a 40+ step synthesis of a marine polyether monster is presented. It is also getting harder these days to secure a grant funding for total synthesis of ginormous natural molecules like taxol. Still there is enough groups doing total synthesis – Its a good training for the students and way of showcasing new methodology.
If I had the option I would love to do some kind of catalytic asymmetric cyclization methodology project (that one person can complete within four years) and then use the new methodology on some small natural molecule in the end.
Milkshake and colleagues – I am new to this group, and am not a chemist, so please forgive me if my etiquette is a little off. I am a molecular biologist at Hopkins who has become very interested in protein kinase inhibitors such as Sutent (sunitinib, SU11248) and their derivatives. I would love to discuss issues related to these molecules with a chemist who knows about their chemistry. If you are interested, it might be best to do it offline. Please contact me at [dzack AT hmi-edu] thanks
Hi Milkshake, how are you? Have you ever try inserting reference number into ChemDraw structures (during Word)? I can do it manually, but imagine a whole thesis & if I change something, I would have to change the whole number thingy and not forgetting changing the text too!!! Any idea? Thanks…
I never had such problem because when I was writing my thesis the best available text processor was XyWrite in DOS and I drew my structures into the blank spaces by hand and xeroxed the result.
Maybe you should divide up your thesis into several Word documents by chapter – it will load up faster that way and you won’t mangle the whole thesis text by one unlucky edit. Just to be sure, separately save all Chemdraw pictures that your are pasting in. MS Word is subtle, malicious He is not.
Also, some chemists swear on using LaTex, ask Kyle at Chemblog – I think that’s what he used for his thesis
DOS? Wow… It has been many many moons ago… Back then computer cost an arm & a leg; I am still a very young lad. *Grin*
Anyway, earlier I have problem with copy and paste into MSWord, but managed to troubleshoot it with advice from Kyle’s blog. Guess I will head over and drop him a line. But, thanks for replying! XXXX (Remember tetrakis?)
thanks for all your posts above.
i want to make amide coupling between 2-(methanamine)pyrazine and 3-oxocyclobutane carboxylic acid. i tried using cdi, dcc, socl2 coupling agent. it worked well but lot of impurities formed. i want to do this on large scale (>2 kg) with out any purification. so i tried making the succinimide derivative of acid using edc.hcl and then coupling it with amine. this worked well but is there any way i can reduce it to one step process?
In your case things can mess up both during the activation stage and the coupling, and your amine is not that reactive, and the product can over-react if there is an excess of coupling reagent. With one-pot large scale procedure it would be difficult to remove spent EDC.HCl coupling reagent.
I would suggest that you first do HOSu(1.1 eq)+ DCC(1 eq., added last)active ester formation in acetonitrile, stir for 1 hour, filter off the urea, rinse the cake with additional acetonitrile (at this point you can check TLC and NMR of a sample from the filtrates, to see how pure the active ester is) and then add your amine with a small amount of N-methylimidazole as a catalyst to the active ester solution, and concentrate to a small volume, check the conversion and do a bicarbonate workup.
Acetonitrile is great for DCC couplings because DDC-urea is nearly insoluble in it. People are afraid of DCC residues but with right solvent/workup choice it actually couples cleaner than EDC.HCl, and is less expensive also.
hiya! my compound is only soluble in dmf or dmso, but i can see it run up a normal phase tlc using a very polar gradient: EtOAc/MeOH/H2O/NH4OH (5:3:1:1). Any trick to be able to reproduce/scale up this gradient to a column scale (not reverse phase) without dissolving the silica. any suggestions are welcome. cheers!
Comment by beginner — September 23, 2009 @ 8:05 pm
some stuff is so insoluble that silica column is not a good way of purifying it. By the way, do not use DMF for loading stuff on silica – it will never leave completely and it would mess up your separation. Also, maybe the next time please leave your comment under the relevant post (I will see it there because it shows up on my admin bar.) Thanks
Hi Milkshake, how are you? Need to pick your brain: Me have a chiral compound, with 4 stereocenter, but symmetrical (hence making my life easier). Through computer modeling,calculation and mechanistic reasoning, we chose 1 (with the lowest energy). NMR gives a nice clean spectra, got the HRMS and everything else. But referee is not very convince. He thinks it will be good idea to run it down HPLC , just to check and to confirm it is not mesomeric mixture. My question, how do one choose the chiral column for HPLC?
Me don’t have much money in me piggy bank, have to be very careful when buying. Appreciate your comments and feedbacks.
Me thank you very very much.
Comment by Taitauwai — November 3, 2009 @ 11:21 am
How do you do? This is Fikrewolde from one of the universities in Ethiopia. I was impressed by the posts about Dr.Perelman in Perfect Rigour. But the thing is I haven’t read it yet and may not be able to read it within some days. I thought you would help me read it by sending me some of the interesting pages you have read in the book.
Thanks in advance for reading it.
Please try to contact me.
Comment by Fikrewolde — November 7, 2009 @ 9:01 am
I do not have this book that you are interested in – I saw the New Yorker piece and few other articles but not his biography. My comments were only observations on whats obvious from the articles. (And he reminds me someone I knew once.)
All best, Milkshake
I saw your post on In the Pipeline last January about your frustration with the acetonitrile shortage last year. I’m currently writing a story about this for Scienceline.org and I’d love to speak with you to get more information about how your research was affected and what your feelings are now about it all, a number of months after the fact.
I hope to hear from you soon!
Comment by SL writer — November 10, 2009 @ 10:48 am
Well thanks for the interest, we were affected a bit but our three main solvent suppliers tried to do their best and eventually they sent us at least few boxes from our two-month-backordered acetonitrile orders, enough to get through the dry spell. I think we went without MeCN for only about one week – still a huge hassle in a medchem group. Since then we stockpiled ( = hoarded up) enough to last us for at least six weeks of average usage, and we keep this inventory in reserve, and we limited our usage by switching to 50%-50% mix of methanol with MeCN instead of MeCN in prep HPLC purifications (which consume most of acetonitrile in our group, so this practically halved the MeCN consumption). The reason for MeCN consumption-cutting measure was obviously the price not only the availability, as MeCN continues to cost us about twice as much than it was a year before. I could go into more details about heated conversations with particular vendors and various wanna-be profiteers but I will leave it at this – at this point I will pass on the chance of getting interviewed. Best luck with your article!
Understood milkshake – I understand and respect your need to be confidential on this blog. If it makes you feel any better – I innocently found you and this blog through your In the Pipeline posting re MeCN and I found that by doing a Google Blog search for “acetonitrile shortage” …sometimes this works to get interviews, sometimes not ;)
Comment by SL writer — November 11, 2009 @ 1:07 am
I am a fellow East European with quite similar early chemistry experiences to yours. I have a write-up that would be useful for grad students/postdocs who come to US and are not familiar with the system here. If you are interested in posting it please email me.
Maybe this isnt the right place to post this, but I am contacting as many chem-blog owners that I ritually read for useful insight and practical tips.
I’m considering making a site of my own that deals simply with “things you don’t know that nobody will teach you that will save you a million hours in the lab” etc.
I’ve been trying to find a reasoning for why in some cases, particular molecules tend to behave well on TLC, however utilizing the same solvent system, or even massively reducing it (or removing it alltogether!) cause everything in the mixture to ‘rush out’ in the first one or two fractions when you step up to a flash column.
For instance, 5% MeOH in CHCl3 is a standard for me, on TLC I get seperations with a suitable RF, and good delta-RF’s (0.2-0.3, sometimes more) – yet loading onto a well packed column, everything floods out instantly.
In 6 months of searching the only reference to this phenomena I have found is “This rule is only applicable when the weak solvent does not move the sample through the stationary phase.” (DOI 10.1007/s11030-008-9104-x)
Naturally I am going to try other solvent systems like hexane/ethyl acetate, but I have seen this to be a common event over a number of years, with no reasoning as to why it occurs.
If you have any ideas in your infinite wisdom, please share!
it is an effect of overloaded column, try to apply the stuff in less polar mix and bring the concentration of methanol up gradually. Also, methanol has huge exotherm of binding onto silica, you get local “methanol front” sharp zone with strong overheating and mixing effect, that can ruin the separation. Also, finer silica separates better, make sure you silica grade is something like 25-40 micrometer particle size. Stay away from the 65 micrometer flash silica.
first I am not that successful chemist – I did not finish grad school. Also, frustration and boredom happen in most projects, its a quite normal state of affair. It matters how long it lasts and whether you could do anything about it. My suggestion would be to find something that excites you and a boss that motivates you. At this point you probably want to finish your thesis project as soon as possible and move on to some better things. Try to get enjoyable chemistry project as a postdoc. I wrote on similar subject:
I do not think you can actually dissolve silica in methanol – please do an experiment with straight MeOH – filter, evaporate, weight out the residue (if there is any). The problem with polar solvents pushing silica through is with a local overheating/overpressure zone that happens because the polar component is absorbed out of the eluent completely and it forms a sharp second front – and since absorbtion of polar solvents to silica is strongly exothermic… you end up with hot zone moving down the column. If you use MeOH in mobile phase you need to slurry-pack the silica into the column in your mobile phase (not dry-pack your silica). Also, ramping up the concentration of the polar component (ie MeOH) in the mobile phase during elution needs to be done gradually and the flow rate needs to be reduced so that the heat from MeOH binding to silica generated on the column has a chance to dissipate.
I don’t know – when in doubt I would buy a new can of DIBAL, it is not that expensive and one botched experiment is worth more. People did NMR of organolithiums in non-deuterated solvents without locking so i suppose one can use the same technique.
unfortunately I have not done it myself. I wonder if adding a catalytic amount of CuI might help with the cross-coupling. Have you looked up precedents in Scifinder/Beilstein – what kind of isopropyl electrophile can be used for this purpose?
Any speculation as to why iPrMgCl seems to be the reagent of choice for Knochel-type chemistry, instead of EtMgBr? I imagine it has something mechanistic to do with the halogen-metal exchange and 2′ vs. 1′, but I don’t know what…
I don’t know the mechanistic explanation. Few years ago there was a paper in J. of Process R&D where they had a table of various grignards they tried for halogen-Mg exchange on their pharma intermediate and from the yield/conversion standpoint there was a clear advantage with secondary grignards, with sec-butylMgCl and cyclopentylMgCl somewhat better/faster than iPrMgCl. So they were recommending to use sec-Bu-MgCl for scale-ups. But I also remember that few years back I was using a procedure for Br-Mg exchange on N-(3-bromo-5-fluorophenyl)-pyrrolidine, a procedure that called for mixed metal Knochel-like reagent that was made by mixing nBuLi with nBuMgCl in 1:2 ratio, and it worked very well.
Is there any diagnostic test to distingusih two different qualities of dibromodimethylhydantoin and also to distinguish two different qualities of AIBN. Based on the current method of analysis, two different qualities meet the requirements, but it doesn’t behave in the same way during the bromination reaction.
for dibromohydantoin you can try melting point and UV-vis spectra of a freshly-made solution in acetonitrile. I have never done a rigorous process batch quality control myself but I know that with NBS brominations a trace of elemental bromine or residual acidity sometimes improves the bromination outcome – paradoxically an old brownish NBS bottle sometimes works better than a freshly re-crystallized colorless one. If I remember correctly the reproducibility fix was to add 1 drop of concentrated HBr solution to the reaction mix, to emulate the effect of an aged batch.
AIBN solid decomposes easily with evolution of gaseous products – sometimes explosively – I wonder if you can do thermogravimetry or microcalorimetry, to see the temperature of the onset of decomposition. But maybe the easiest thing would be to take NMR.
I dont know but it is going to be difficult – piperazine is very water soluble, it forms a solid hydrate with water and bicarbonate with CO2 and it is quite volatile as a solid. I wonder if you can neutralize and evaporate it to make an anhydrous sulfate salt and then melt the salt it with solid CaO to sublimate anhydrous piperazine from the mix. By the way, anhydrous piperazine is quite cheap – why dont you just buy it?
We’re in the process of re-designing our organic teaching labs for “honors” students.
I’d like to have a lab – after they’ve had 1 semester of Orgo and training in basic techniques – as a “frustration problem solving lab”.
This is not the kind of frustration that is from an intractable problem, but rather, to begin to train them to realize they don’t just have one hammer (i.e. if all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail).
In this context, I’d like an experiment that shows that with purification: the goal is not to * do chromatography * , but rather to separate compounds in order to purify them.
i) With this in mind, do you know of any pairs – or trios – of *commercially available* compounds that are a bitch to separate (delta RF of <0.05) on Normal phase tlc,
but would be amenable to acid/basic/other kind of extraction
e.g. alcohol vs carboxylic acid with similar Rfs
alcohol vs amine with Similar Rfs
or even fluorous vs nonfluorus or hyrophobic vs hydropilic pairs with similar Rfs
ii) is there a resource of TLC rfs available with diff solvent systems
Also: if you had any other suggestions for LIMITED yet real technical problem solving experiences that are similar to the and applicable to 4h sophomore organic labs, I'm all ears……i
From A Big Academic Fan of Milkshake's Synthetic Mojo.
…….the origin of this is from a research advisor bemoaning that "trained" students don't know how to attack simple optimizations of reactions and their workup based on obvious chemical properties.
If you want things that are very close on TLC (in all solvent systems) the natural choice would be a mixture of isomeric compounds. (Of course you cannot separate them by acid/base extraction). One thing that comes to mind are o- and p-hydroxybenzaldehyde. The ortho isomer co-distils with water steam, the para isomer remains in the distillation flask. Look up Reimer-Tiemann preparation of salicylaldehyde from phenol, I am sure it will be in J. Chem. Ed. or Orgsyn. I think there was some similarly simple technique for separating o- and p-nitrophenol after nitration of phenol with 20% aqueous nitric acid – look it up too.
Sory, I am the wrong person to ask, I have no experience with designing teaching experiments.
PS: A non-Mickey Mouse experiment to try would be preparation of racemic 2,2′-binaphtol from beta naphtol – the starting material is quite close to the product on TLC and can co-crystallize with the product but beta naphtol is somewhat soluble in hot water (and volatile with water steam) and therefore it can be removed by boiling the crude product from the reaction mixture with lots of water. The preparation of binaphtol goes like this: ethanolic solution of beta napthol is added in parallel at the same rate as separately-made aqueous solution of FeCl3 hexahydrate (1.05 eq.) into a big beaker full of hot water at 90-100C with stirring C dropwise, over half an hour. Collect the precipitated crude product by filtration, wash it with lots of boiling water, dry. Re-crystallize from large volume benzene (toluene or ethanol+water works as well but benzene gives a superb product purity and yield after one re-crystallization). The starting beta naphtol has often dark-colored tarry impurities which can carry over into the binaphtol product so it is worth to re-crystallize the commercial beta naphtol from water-ethanol before the use if you care for the binaphtol purity.
Maybe you can give this as assignment: Develop a procedure for producing beautiful colorless crystals of racemic binaphtol from beta naphtol in better than 50% yield, preferably as simple as possible, and figure out what factors are important for achieving the best purity (rather than yield), try different solvents for re-crystallization of the crude product, try to re-crystallize the starting material to see if it improves the product purity. Measure the melting point, develop a TLC system for detecting the starting material impurity in the product.”
You should consider publishing your interesting blog entries instead at http://figshare.com/
Thereby, they are permanently archived, are citable via a DOI, are post-publication peer-reviewed via comments and shares to social networks, and you can report these additional metrics on your resume.